On Modesty: Ruminations on the Other

2013
04.18

Any of you that follow me on Goodreads have seen evidence of my new literary crush: Jacky Faber the intrepid heroine of the Bloody Jack books. Jackie is impulsive, brash, inventive, whip-smart and immodest and I see more than a little of my own personality in her. When she misbehaves Jacky is prone to lay blame at her childhood as a street orphan in early 1800s London: ‘I wasn’t brought up proper’! The legions of well-kissed gentlemen she leaves in her wake are by turns gob-smacked or outraged or aroused. Jacky continually says ‘it was just a bit of fun’. Jacky can get away with this, because she is fictional, but were any girl to act like this in real life, the censure of society would quickly either stop it, or put it into the whore-house.

Jacky has made me realize how shoddy the cloak of modesty really is. Modesty, in short, is a two pronged tool; one prong is designed to keep people in their place, the second is designed to keep out the ‘other’. How it accomplishes the first is obvious – one only has to look to cultures that practice extreme modesty to see how rigidly ‘place’ is enforced. I am not making judgments here on the rightness of these cultures – just stating the fact that when rules of cultural modesty are enforced in the extreme, we also see restrictive gender roles, and rigid space rules that involve men’s space and women’s space being separate. Often times these cultures are also closed to strangers, which brings me to my second point:

The idea of the second prong of modesty (and related cultural rules) has me thinking deeper. In it’s most basic form, the rules that govern cultural behavior also create an easy short-hand for identifying those that don’t fit in. We fear the other so deeply that we create entire systems of coded rules and behaviors to keep them out. This works very well in an archaic situation where you need to be able to tell the marauding Viking from a local farmer, but it is not so good in the modern cultures of the first and second world. Fear of the other is one of the prime causes of our current insanity where our legislators vote against love and vote for semi-automatic weapons. After all – we need weapons to defend against the other and we cannot allow that other to adopt the cultural behaviors we hold dear because how on earth would we recognize them.

As a child I chafed against the constraints of modesty. I had no understanding how someone could equate my desire to take my shirt off while working in the fields, (just like all the boys), with sex or dirtiness. I just liked the feel of the sun on my shoulders. I was not required to stay clothed for my benefit. I was required to keep my shirt on so that I fit the pattern our culture had established. They needed me to fall in line so that I would not distract them from their vigilance towards the other.

Jacky gets away with breaking her culture’s rules because she is a fictional heroine. But I can’t help thinking that our culture would be far better off if more of us cast off these old rules, admitted the ‘other’ in our midst and learned to live and let live.

Post from the Echo Chamber

2013
04.15

‘Do you talk to yourself?’ my husband asked. I answered ‘no’, but looking at my blog posts lately I think I might need to revise that, because obviously I am talking to myself here.

Depths of Despair

2013
04.01

I had a knock-back this week. It put me in the depths of despair – those muddy doldrums where insecurity, grief, anger and confusion mix into a toxic cauldron of emotion. When this is your landscape you are as likely to burst into tears as to kiss someone. You might start a fanatic new exercise regimen, hardening yourself for revenge. You might climb into bed pulling the covers over your head refuse to come out into the light of day. You might do all of these things interchangeably.

Some things are certain when you feel this way. You don’t connect emotionally with those closest to you. You don’t invite physical intimacy. You don’t respond well when challenged. And you certainly don’t write.

Let’s hope I find my way out of the depths soon. I’m not at home here.

Keeping It Real

2013
03.24

January was an interesting month of discovery for me. I am a member of the Vaginal Fantasy Bookclub on GoodReads and the book of the month was one of my all-time favorites: Outlander by Diana Gabaldon. I was expecting a great discussion, anticipating the rapture of new converts to Jamie worship and Highland minutia. The great discussion part did happen, but not the secondary effects of hero worship and historical trivia geekery. Part of this may be due to the fact that the book is twenty years old, and the world has changed a great deal but part of it is, I suspect, a need for the current audience to escape reality.

The protagonists of Outlander are both very real, and flawed. They make bad choices, they hurt each other, they cave in to peer pressure, they claim to love each other and yet act in opposition of that claim. In general, they act like real humans in love do. This can be disconcerting in a book world, where the reader expects straightforward conflict paired with tidy resolutions.

Many of the discussions revolved around the statements “How could he?” and “I would never forgive!” We, as readers, are not used to seeing our romantic leads shown with warts and all. We are more fond of the version of a love-story where the supposed hurt was in truth a misunderstanding and once it is cleared away the happy ever after happens. Only that is not how love is in real life. Sometimes, people are dicks to each other. Sometimes we act against our own best interests without truly thinking things through. Sometimes we cave in when we should fight. Sometimes we fight when we should support each other. So the question is, do we want reality in our books?

For me, that answer is a resounding, yes! I can rarely enjoy reading a book where the messy parts of human interactions are sanitized away. I need the gritty, dirty and occasionally shitty reality to make me honestly love a character. It is what I want to read – it is what I try and write.

BUT… I also like the framework of ‘story’ where things happen in a compacted time-line or more adventures happen to one person that is reasonable to expect in our normal lives. I am not one to enjoy ‘domestic dramas’ for example. I rarely read literary fiction nowadays, because to much of it results in beautifully written books where nothing happens. So in this case, my answer would be no! I do not want too much reality in my books.

In the end run, I guess what I like is realistic characters in fantastic situations.

How much reality do you want in your fantasy?

Starting A New Writing/Critique Group

2013
02.23

I got serious about my writing five years ago. It was NaNoWriMo (The National Novel Writing Month) that pushed me out of my dabbler’s comfort zone and into the realm of Dedicated Writer. NaNo taught me the value of getting words on paper. It taught me that quantity can produce quality and creation is most effective when messy, reckless and a little unmoored from reality. The annual craziness that is November taught me that it is okay to ‘play’ during the writing process, and to abandon myself to the sheer joy of story. I also learned that the first burst of inspired abandon does not produce a book. It merely produces the clay out of which you will fashion your book, and the months that follow NaNo take on a different quality.

The first few years of participating in NaNo, I failed at this point every time. I would poke and prod my lumpen manuscript, but when it did not coalesce into the book of my dreams I soon lost my interest. Along would come that shiny new idea, and suddenly I was plunging back into the messy creation part that I now understood and had grown to love. A sterling group of fellow writers in Denver Colorado changed that for me.

The Mad Hatters, as we called ourselves due to the proclivity of one of the members to wear silly hats, was the first serious writing and critique group I had ever belonged to. All of the original members had been NaNo participants and all shared the goal of having a completed and polished copy ready by June to take advantage of the CreateSpace prize of a printed copy of our books. In order to support each other in this goal, we created a rigorous process for editing and critiquing designed to get us all to our goal on time.

The level of commitment from these fellow writers was phenomenal, with each of us reading, critiquing, editing and re-writing upwards of 10,000 words each week. Critiques were delivered in writing using the two-pen method – one color for ‘reader’s reactions’ and one for editing marks on grammar, typos and syntax. Come June, eight very proud writers held books in their hands which would not have existed without the support of the group.

In the past two years the group has evolved, losing some members, adding others and changing the name to The Haberdashery (to avoid copyright issues) and even looking into joint writing projects. One thing has stayed the same however, and that is the commitment to supporting each other on the writing journey.

I have moved to Southern California and once again face the challenge of spinning the wheat of my first draft into authorial gold, I have chosen to start a west coast branch of the Haberdashery known as the Barmy Drapers. We are just as mad as our Rocky Mountain counterparts, and just as committed to finishing and editing our books. For the future, we are hoping to plan a joint writer’s retreat with the Colorado crew, and to do book exchanges from group to group, basically serving as beta readers and long distance critique partners for each other.

Now that I am serious about my writing I would not contemplate ‘going it alone’. I believe a strong and focused writing/critique group is critical to my success.

How about you?

Half a Century?!? I’m Not Dead Yet!

2013
02.11

I turned fifty on Saturday and other than feeling mildly surprised at this fact when seeing it in black and white on the page,  I am truly not bothered by this date that others tell me should feel momentous.

I have never been one to worry about getting older. Thanks to being a pregnant teen, I have always been out of step (out of age?) with my contemporaries. Those my age did not have children until much later. Those with children the same age as mine were always older.

I went to college for the first time when I was forty, and became a Gran during my university years. Many of my closest friends are ten or twenty years younger, or a dozen years older. Maybe the mixed-up order of my life has led me to feel unaffected by time, or maybe the fact that my milestones have been so removed from the normal societal structure  means that society’s ideas of age and aging have less effect on me.

Whatever the reason, I feel, at age fifty nothing so much as an anticipation for the future. My life has been so eventful, and each chapter has brought such adventures that the milestone of a half century is simply the marker for the next exciting chapter of my life.

The Next Big Thing

2013
02.04

1) What is the working title of your next book?

Treachery Aboard The Palace du Mar

2) Where did the idea come from for the book?

I have been getting into Steampunk lately, and the idea for this book came out of the random musings about the age of steam combined with a picture of a Roman Quadreme that was large enough to have a full-sized temple on its deck. Of course the Roman ships were powered by oars manned by slaves, but who said you couldn’t have steam powered oars? My original idea was to make the ship a luxury liner, and to use it as the setting for a central romance, but as I did research into shipbuilding I realized my design would create a ship that could never be profitable. After all, it is the third and second class passengers that truly fund a ship of that size, but due to the need for extra engine space and fly space for shipping the oars, my ship would have no third class berths and very little second, most of which would be occupied by ship’s employees. The Palace had to have a better way to make money. That was when I decided to turn it into an exclusive, high-class brothel that catered to the royalty and nobility. After that, the central story of my heroine inheriting the ship after her father’s murder fell into place.

3. What genre does your book fall under?

Lucky for me, Steampunk is its own genre with many different types of books so I don’t have to sacrifice my genre bending elements.

4. What actors would you choose to play the part of your characters in a movie rendition?

 

 

Connor Graves– the murdered father – is an affable and voluble man who is self-effacing and almost naive. George Clooney would be perfect.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Katherine (Kitten Graves) the eighteen year old heroine – is a prim and proper boarding school girl with untested depths and great determination. I think Scottish actress Karen Gillan would be great.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margaurite (Madame Rita) is a French Madame of culture and wit. Alex Kingston would be fabulous in this role.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just Fletcher – Kitten’s Godfather and Connor’s best friend, Just is a freed slave. He is a gentle giant, but has an edge of suppressed violence. I think  Djimon Hounsou would be great!

 

 

 

 

     

Geoffrey  DuChamps – is one of the Mandrakes (male prostitutes) aboard the ship, and is Kitten’s love interest. Adrian Grenier is too old, and yet – curly headed guys can get away with playing younger, can’t they?

 

 

 

 

 

 

James Dickson - Scottish detective and potential rival for Geoffrey in Kitten’s affections. Andrew Rothney would capture his earnestness perfectly – and of course would be a natural for the accent.

 

 

 

 

5) What is the one-sentence synopsis of your book?

Steampunk/Murder Mystery/Romance/Coming of Age story set on a ship of impossible luxury and decadence.

6) Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

I will be seeking to traditionally publish. I like having a team in my corner and cannot afford to hire that team freelance.

7)  How long did it take you to write the first draft of the manuscript?

I wrote the first 65000 words during NaNoWriMo and finished the draft in the following two months – so I guess about three months total.

8) What other books would you compare this story to within your genre?

Hmmm this is hard, because Steampunk is a relatively new genre. Also, because it is a mash-up of a lot of genre elements it isn’t any one thing. It has kind of an Oliver Twist/Treasure Island vibe: the innocent adventurer thrust into a situation beyond their experience, faced with moral choices and a shifting definition of good.

9) Who or what inspired you to write this book?

I have always loved old ships – both sail and steam powered, and the anarchy of the seas provides the perfect backdrop for a story that can push boundaries while exploring decadence and manners.

10) What else about the book might pique the reader’s interest?

As is common in much of Steampunk, by book takes place in an alternate history where Scotland and England never merged crowns or parliaments. Scotland rose to international prominence, and colonized the U.S. Scottish tax law is very different than English law, so in my alternate history, the United States of New Scotland never rebelled, and are still colonies. It is fun investigating what America would be like if we still had a King. ALSO – Steampunk allows me to imagine a world where there is more gender equality, and the Scottish enlightenment continued into the Victorian age. For the brothel, this aspect provides a rich panoply of characters, courtesans and  customers, of both sexes and every inclination.

 

So – that’s it for me. I tag Colleen Riordan, Thomas Cardin, Tatiana Stapleton, Kelly Parker,  and Linda Tschappat

MIA – A Year Dissolving

2012
11.30

Sometimes, for no particular reason, I go MIA. I am an extremely driven person with a to do list a mile long, and activities from Dawn to Dusk and I generally love chatting about my exploits to any and all who will listen. But sometimes I get mentally exhausted and just stop talking about all the stuff I am doing. That is how it has been since July.

I am still DOING all the stuff: editing one book, writing another, supporting my husband in the awesome @TwtrSymphony project, joining book clubs, visiting family, hosting my GrandBoys for 3 weeks, going to Disneyland, starting a horrible new job, interviewing for better ones, making new friends, attending concerts and the theater, becoming a Municipal Liaison for NaNoWriMo, doing NaNoWriMo, setting up a new writers group, buying a new car, researching history and science for current novel, moving furniture, watching films, attending dinner parties, learning to make the perfect Gruyere tart… the list goes on.

So I do all the stuff, but I just can’t seem to talk about it. Not here on my blog – not on the phone with family, often not even with my husband whom I tell everything. I don’t really understand why I turn from Chatty Cathy to Sullen Sally either.

Do any of you experience anything similar?

 

 

Of Cakes and Bullets

2012
07.20

Two items of sad news in my inbox today from friends in Colorado.

1)The shooting in Aurora.

2)A bakery in Littleton refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

How are they connected?

In both instances, one tragic and one trivial a single party takes an action, based on their own personal thoughts and emotions without regard for who gets hurt.

In both instances the perpetrator puts their own thoughts, values, feelings and actions in a position of supremacy over others.

In both cases, they lash-out with a sense of justice, heart-felt belief, and a sure knowledge that their world view can be forced onto others. One does this with guns and violence, one with a sneering discrimination.

How long must we continue as humans to face our fellows with censure, scorn, violence and hatred.

How long must we let the rage and fear control us.

I know that a cake is nothing in comparison to a shooting, but every drop of water contributes to the ocean of hatred.

People who go mad and shoot innocents are such a big thing – a problem I can’t even begin to unpack or find solution for.

People who refuse to provide a cake for a celebration of love when they don’t agree with the source of that love? That is a small thing that I believe we can find a solution for.

If we can change our behaviors towards each other one drop at a time, maybe we can beat this thing and become the loving, giving, sheltering and caring humanity we are capable of imagining.

 Maybe we can stop talking about cake and bullets and start celebrating weddings and film openings.

Review: Crewel by Gennifer Albin

2012
06.30

Book Blurb or

What the flap says this book is about:

Incapable. Awkward. Artless.

That’s what the other girls whisper behind her back. But sixteen year-old Adelice Lewys has a secret: she wants to fail.

Gifted with the ability to weave time with matter, she’s exactly what the Guild is looking for, and in the world ofArras, being chosen as a Spinster is everything a girl could want. It means privilege, eternal beauty, and being something other than a secretary. It also means the power to embroider the very fabric of life. But if controlling what people eat, where they live and how many children they have is the price of having it all, Adelice isn’t interested.

Not that her feelings matter, because she slipped and wove a moment at testing, and they’re coming for her—tonight.

Now she has one hour to eat her mom’s overcooked pot roast. One hour to listen to her sister’s academy gossip and laugh at her Dad’s stupid jokes. One hour to pretend everything’s okay. And one hour to escape.

Because once you become a Spinster, there’s no turning back.

My Cover Blurb or

What I would say if asked:

Weaving complex themes of gender roles, agency and moral relativism into a tapestry of pounding hearts and impossible choices, Gennifer Albin has created a world where the dreams and desires ofone sixteen year old warp the very fabric of reality. – Eddie Louise

10 Words Review:

 

Story:

Galvanizing

Main Character:

Contentious

Supporting Characters:

Meretricious

Plot:

Polemic

Setting:

Palpable

Voice:

Conflict: Confidant

Mastery

Resolution:

Escalated

Theme:

Causation

Variations:

Feminism

 

I received an ARC of Crewel from the publisher. Crewel will be published in the USA 10/16/12.

http://genniferalbin.com/

http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/4906436.Gennifer_Albin