<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eddie Louise                         </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eddielouise.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eddielouise.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Cakes and Bullets by Marie Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/07/of-cakes-and-bullets/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/?p=607#comment-882</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Singing Out Loud by Sirzad</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2011/01/singing-out-loud-3/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirzad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2011/01/singing-out-loud-3/#comment-818</guid>
		<description>make sure they have plenty of aohocll wherever you choose, I&#039;ve only ever made one public karaoke appearance and made a vow that no one should ever have to witness such a shocking performance again.. so therefore I can&#039;t guarantee my participation.FYI, I sang  Chocolate salty balls , from chef of SouthPark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make sure they have plenty of aohocll wherever you choose, I&#8217;ve only ever made one public karaoke appearance and made a vow that no one should ever have to witness such a shocking performance again.. so therefore I can&#8217;t guarantee my participation.FYI, I sang  Chocolate salty balls , from chef of SouthPark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subtext and the Art of Subtle Influence by martha</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/03/subtext-and-the-art-of-subtle-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/03/subtext-and-the-art-of-subtle-influence/#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Amen, Brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 29 Tweets &#8211; February 5 &#8211; Horse Killer and Dead Dog by EddieLouise</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/02/29-tweets-february-5-horse-killer-and-dead-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>EddieLouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/02/29-tweets-february-5-horse-killer-and-dead-dog/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Yeah - 
It is kinda fun digging into the past like this, but only 29 entries for all of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211;<br />
It is kinda fun digging into the past like this, but only 29 entries for all of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 29 Tweets &#8211; February 5 &#8211; Horse Killer and Dead Dog by Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/02/29-tweets-february-5-horse-killer-and-dead-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/02/29-tweets-february-5-horse-killer-and-dead-dog/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>Hey I never had a pic of Festus. That is cool! Was the other pic you on Dutch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I never had a pic of Festus. That is cool! Was the other pic you on Dutch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeepers for Self Publishing? by EddieLouise</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>EddieLouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Pete,

I don&#039;t think this is mean. Controversial? Perhaps, but this is exactly the issue I am speaking of. I recently was asked to read a work that had numerous 5 star review on amazon, and had many indie writers crowing about it as well. The author in the 1st three paragraphs contradicted herself twice - stating a fact and then showing action that put the lie to the fact. If done for humor this sort of linguistic reversal can be very effective. In a purported para-normal fantasy, it was irritating. Worse because I could tell it was down to poor vocabulary. The author had the word Guardian firmly in her head in its parental function, forgetting that it also could mean bodyguard. 

As an Editor I would have had this entire passage excised. As a reader, it made it impossible for me to read the book because in my head I was lecturing the writer, not getting to know the characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is mean. Controversial? Perhaps, but this is exactly the issue I am speaking of. I recently was asked to read a work that had numerous 5 star review on amazon, and had many indie writers crowing about it as well. The author in the 1st three paragraphs contradicted herself twice &#8211; stating a fact and then showing action that put the lie to the fact. If done for humor this sort of linguistic reversal can be very effective. In a purported para-normal fantasy, it was irritating. Worse because I could tell it was down to poor vocabulary. The author had the word Guardian firmly in her head in its parental function, forgetting that it also could mean bodyguard. </p>
<p>As an Editor I would have had this entire passage excised. As a reader, it made it impossible for me to read the book because in my head I was lecturing the writer, not getting to know the characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeepers for Self Publishing? by Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to say something mean and controversial.

Most of the time, spelling and grammar mistakes can be fixed by any good editor, but the underlying work is still going to stink (unless the editor pretty much rewrites the whole manuscript). The end product is just well-edited crap. Cardboard characters. Stilted dialogue. Plot holes. Boring prose.

I&#039;m glad that professional editors have a bigger pool of potential customers, but honestly, I have no idea how you guys can bear working with what you undoubtedly see. And then there&#039;s the problem dealing with the reactions to your suggestions. Cluelessness is too often accompanied by thin skin.

It must be teeth-gnashingly aggravating.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to say something mean and controversial.</p>
<p>Most of the time, spelling and grammar mistakes can be fixed by any good editor, but the underlying work is still going to stink (unless the editor pretty much rewrites the whole manuscript). The end product is just well-edited crap. Cardboard characters. Stilted dialogue. Plot holes. Boring prose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that professional editors have a bigger pool of potential customers, but honestly, I have no idea how you guys can bear working with what you undoubtedly see. And then there&#8217;s the problem dealing with the reactions to your suggestions. Cluelessness is too often accompanied by thin skin.</p>
<p>It must be teeth-gnashingly aggravating.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeepers for Self Publishing? by Heather Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Eddie, I love this post. I am thrilled to see so many people stand up and take a voice against published drivel that seems to be rampant all of the sudden. When free reign is given to a rookie, this is what happens. 

On the other hand, it&#039;s really no different than any other business--there are competent people and incompetent, ego-driven folks with nothing to back it up, and hard-working, driven folks determined to make a name for themselves. 

Great conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie, I love this post. I am thrilled to see so many people stand up and take a voice against published drivel that seems to be rampant all of the sudden. When free reign is given to a rookie, this is what happens. </p>
<p>On the other hand, it&#8217;s really no different than any other business&#8211;there are competent people and incompetent, ego-driven folks with nothing to back it up, and hard-working, driven folks determined to make a name for themselves. </p>
<p>Great conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeepers for Self Publishing? by EddieLouise</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>EddieLouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>It is the &#039;melting down&#039; part that really boggles my mind. 

And it is also why we (at least in my experience) keep schtumm when met with inferior writing in the indie world. In the world of big publishing, if a book is published with poor writing there are many places to spread the blame, in indie writing, it is nearly always because a writer has published something without the business framework you mention.

But is keeping quiet serving anyone in the long run?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the &#8216;melting down&#8217; part that really boggles my mind. </p>
<p>And it is also why we (at least in my experience) keep schtumm when met with inferior writing in the indie world. In the world of big publishing, if a book is published with poor writing there are many places to spread the blame, in indie writing, it is nearly always because a writer has published something without the business framework you mention.</p>
<p>But is keeping quiet serving anyone in the long run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gatekeepers for Self Publishing? by Patti Larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddielouise.com/2012/01/who-will-be-the-gatekeepers-of-self-publishing/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>The biggest issue here is that indie (and not just indie!) writers have never been taught to be business people. How to build their own little publishing company (literally!) by hiring the right editors, proofers, cover designers and format specialists. There is so much more to it than simply writing the book and that fact is being lost. If writing were treated like any other business, more writers would put out quality product, I&#039;m certain of it.

That being said, you have two choices, really--either stop reviewing indie writers or ask for a sample page (that should be all you need) before you agree to anything. Speaking out about that writer will probably only amount to heartache for you and them. It&#039;s a sad fact, and no it isn&#039;t fair. We&#039;ve seen both traditional and indie writers melt down over just such issues, often messily and in public. I wish you luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest issue here is that indie (and not just indie!) writers have never been taught to be business people. How to build their own little publishing company (literally!) by hiring the right editors, proofers, cover designers and format specialists. There is so much more to it than simply writing the book and that fact is being lost. If writing were treated like any other business, more writers would put out quality product, I&#8217;m certain of it.</p>
<p>That being said, you have two choices, really&#8211;either stop reviewing indie writers or ask for a sample page (that should be all you need) before you agree to anything. Speaking out about that writer will probably only amount to heartache for you and them. It&#8217;s a sad fact, and no it isn&#8217;t fair. We&#8217;ve seen both traditional and indie writers melt down over just such issues, often messily and in public. I wish you luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
